In literature class
this quarter, we read Oedipus Rex, by
Sophocles, a Greek playwright. The main character, Oedipus, learns from the
oracle that he must drive out something evil from Thebes in order to save it.
He deduces that he must find and exile the murderer of the former king, Laios.
Through another clairvoyant and the accounts of eye witnesses, Oedipus learns
that he killed Laios. Therefore, he blinds himself. The theme of blindness is
used a multitude of times throughout the play. For example, the blind prophet,
Tiresias tells Oedipus what has happened, but Oedipus refuses to believe him. Tiresias
accuses Oedipus of being the one who is blind. Then after Oedipus finds out the
truth, he stabs his eyes in order to blind himself. It is hard to tell if he
does as an act of bravery, to punish himself, or an act of cowardice, to not
have to see what he has done. I believe that it is more courage because Oedipus
follows through with his promise to punish Laios’s killer. This play is widely
agreed to be a masterpiece, but I do not fully agree. Everything in the plot
seems to be impossibly convenient. I think that if this story were written now
instead of in ancient times, no one would think it was anything special.
Furthermore, the odes, while they are supposed to connect the reader with the
story, are not really necessary to understand what is going on. However, one
good thing about the play is that Oedipus is the perfect example of a tragic
character. He is a great king at first, but then he becomes an incestuous murderer
and is forced to blind himself. I still do not think that Oedipus Rex is as wonderful as people say it is, but I am still
glad that I got the chance to read it.
PAGEVIEWS
Sunday, December 21, 2014
Cat's Cradle Journal 3 (Quarter 2)
I finished Cat's Cradle by Kurt Vonnegut Jr. In the end, the ice-nine falls into the
ocean, and the world ends. The ocean turns to stone, and tornadoes tear up the
land. The narrator survives by hiding in an underground dungeon with Mona, his
new wife. It is implied that most, if not all, of the rest of humanity has
perished, but no one can be sure. In the final chapter of the novel, the
narrator finally meets Bokonon, who is writing the last sentence of his book.
He writes that if he was younger, then he would “write a history of human stupidity
… climb to the top the top of Mount McCabe… [and die] grinning horribly, and
thumbing my nose at You Know Who.” The story’s conclusion is open-ended, but
the reader can infer that the narrator does exactly what Bokonon suggests. I could
not have predicted that the book would end this way, but it was foreshadowed.
The narrator had stated several times that he felt irrationally compelled to
climb Mount McCabe, but he did not know why. Also, Frank Hoenikker tells the
narrator that no one has ever climbed Mount McCabe, simply because they have
not felt the need to do so. There is a chilling scene after the narrator returns
to the surface, when he sees the citizens of San Lorenzo have committed mass
suicide at the suggestion of Bokonon, though Bokonon himself still lives. Mona
tells that the narrator that Bokonon would never follow his own advice because
he knew how worthless it was. Naturally, the narrator views this as a terrible
atrocity. However, Mona sees everyone’s deaths as an appropriate response to
the circumstances and kills herself as well. I believe that this is a good
representation of the madness that goes with the horror of the situation. I
really enjoyed reading Cat’s Cradle
and might even consider reading it again someday.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)